> I don't think this is an ideal way to fix this command -- using error
> handling to do control flow is usually the wrong thing to do, and it
> makes debugging difficult. What if there's a real bug in
> Instead eww-list-bookmarks should just do the
> (unless eww-bookmarks
> (user-error "No bookmarks are defined"))
> bit, I think. It might mean rearranging some stuff in eww-next-bookmark
> etc, though.
Thanks, good point. Does the attached patch look better?